Pamela Anderson Needs You to Know ‘Porn Is For Losers’

Beware porn lovers, Pamela Anderson is not here for you.

In fact, she thinks you’re kind of a loser.

Recently, Pamela Anderson has decided to join the uphill battle against porn by writing an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal with an unlikely writing partner, an ultra-conservative rabbi.

“As if anyone still doubted the devastation that porn addiction wreaks on those closest to the addict, behold the now shattered marriage of Mr. [Anthony] Weiner and Huma Abedin,” Pammy began. “From our respective positions of rabbi-counselor and former Playboy model and actress, we have often warned about pornography’s corrosive effects on a man’s soul and on his ability to function as a husband, and by extension, as father. This is a public hazard of unprecedented seriousness.”

She also goes on to warn that children, whom she calls “the crack babies of porn,” are especially at risk to fall prey to porn because they’re being raised in an “environment of wall-to-wall, digitalized sexual images.”

While the claim that porn is “a public hazard of unprecedented seriousness” is a little farfetched, it’s generally agreed upon that teenage boys who watch porn 24/7 are the worst and can make the young girls who wind up having sex with them feel like pieces of shit — not to mention incredibly sore from being artlessly jackhammered all night.

Still, there’s at least one demographic who’s likely to start stanning for Pammy: Moms.

If anybody in America is willing to take such a staunch stand against porn, it’s the tireless women who spend countless hours trying to get the semen out of everything their horny teenage sons touch.

Porn may not actually destroy lives, but it sure does destroy a mother’s patience.

[H/T The Wall Street Journal]


Gimme More POP


Do You Like?

Some things are only found on Facebook. Don't miss out.